Skip to main content

What does the resignation of two important men tell us about Afghan government?

The legacies of the Afghan Peace Jirga didn’t turn out to be peaceful. Just days after the Jirga Declaration, the Afghan government issued an abrupt decree to reopen and review the current Taliban prisoners cases of Taliban prisoners and its Minister of Interior and Chief of National Directorate of Security announced their resignations within the same day.

While both the officials explained the rationale for their resignation as dissatisfaction of the president on the lack of security arrangements during the Peace Jirga that allowed the militants to launch rocket attacks, and suicide bombing in close proximities of the Peace Jirga venue. But Afghan critics see the situation much more complex and different.

This is the first time in the past 9 years of the Afghan government to see such high profile officials resign over lack of effectiveness and responsiveness to the requirements of their jobs, especially when both men, are considered to be the most competent and qualified members of the cabinet. Even when the cabinet members were explicitly accused of corruption and misuse of their political influence and positions, none of them resigned.

Hanif Atmar, who has been the minister for Education, and twice the minister of Interior, with his NGO background, and a former military officer has been among the lead reformists in Afghanistan and his three times easy approvals in the parliament as well reflects his popularity among the Afghan parliament. Atmar has been seen as a potential rival toPresident Karzai in the past years and a member of the cabinet said, the president needed the post of Minister of Interior at this point and in one shot, he killed two birds.

Similarly, Amrullah Saleh, the Chief of Intelligence has been one of the few Northern Alliance members within the government, who was CIA trained and his strong back up of the Northern Alliance leaders wouldn’t allow the President to sideline him in any other way. Saleh has been a critique of the current system and spoke about the lack of political will to trace the militants operations back to Pakistani soil in the Afghan parliament. His speeches that are recorded in the parliament sessions, reflect lack of trust of the president on the information and intelligence that NDS provided, because the president looks at Saleh as a Panjsheri,Northern Alliance member, not his government's Intelligence Chief.

While their resignation is seemingly premised on the failures of the security measures during the Peace Jirga, but such an explanation is difficult to believe, especially since this was not the first instance of their failures to ensure safety and security of such a big gathering. In 2007, during the celebrations of the victory of Mujahidin day, there was a similar bombing that killed MPs and Jihadi leaders just when President Karzai was giving his opening Speech. Therefore, the celebrations were cancelled.

Amrullah Saleh in a press conference on the day of his resignation in Kabul also said there are many other internal and external reasons for his resignation but he didn’t give any further details.

However, those close to him say that there are other reasons for his resignation.He apparently expressed dissent and concerns with President’s plan to release the Taliban or militants leaders and declared them extremely dangerous for the stability of Afghanistan.

It is also said that in the last meeting ,the president was unpleasantly dubious of the information of attacks during the Jirga's first day. President Karzai seems to think that the Jirga's first day attack was a conspiracy of one of the Western powers and not the Taliban. Critics also believe that sideling Amrullah Saleh, who has been a hard line interrogator of the Taliban and militants prisoners, would please the militants and Taliban further. Saleh is now replaced by another Intelligence Chief Ibrahim Spinzada, a Kandahari and believed to be among the supporters of the Taliban groups, he has been involved in negotiations of the Taliban militants from Guantanamo jail as well.

A similar concern could be drawn from Atmar’s press conference from his tone and address to the enemies of Afghanistan. He said: “My position on enemies is solid and clear. Your (enemies) predatory attacks wont affect our determinations and you wont succeed because you are not legitimate”. These statements undermine and question the impunity and legitimacy that were granted to the militants and Taliban by withdrawing their names from blacklists and releasing their prisoners, during the Peace Jirga. In fact, the Jirga covered up the criminal and terrorist aspects of these militants insurgency that was evident in Atmar’s press conference but the Jirga called them merely political “angry brothers”.

The sudden decision of the Afghan government to review the cases of the Taliban prisoners and release them alarms on the fragile nature of the judiciary system that is not technically well equipped to undertake such a crucial inquiry. If notorious militants are released, they will create more serious threats to Afghanistan and international community. After all Mullah Zakir Qayyum is a recent example of such a release who is now the Chief Operating Officer of insurgency in Afghanistan. It is also said that the inquiry Commission for the release of Prisoners did not include NDS, which is a very crucial institution to determine the status of the prisoners captured as militants.

It seems that the Afghan government leadership has decided to come to terms with its armed militants at any cost. However, there is a growing fear and contention in Kabul, that such decisions to turn the government into a Taliban-friendly organization, will further antagonize the rest of the society against the government and increases the chances of another civil unrest among various ethnicities in the country. It is worth mentioning that it was only to topple down the Taliban government that the Northern Alliance joined hands with theOperation Enduring Freedom in October 2001, particularly after the assassination of theNorthern Alliance leader, Ahmad Shah Masood. The challenge for the Afghan government in the coming months and year is in reconciling these two opposing forces under its National Peace and Re-integration Program Plan without further diss-agregation of non-Taliban groups, that might ignite rifts and potential violence.

Paradoxically, while the international community is fighting a lethal war in Afghanistan and embarking on a furious operation in Kandahar, its partner, the Afghan government muddling along an internal political and governance crisis. Half of the cabinet’s fate is unknown for almost 7 months now and the parliament term is over in a month or so. In such a crisis, the president’s priorities seem to be pleasing the “angry brothers” whose own minister calls them as “enemies” but the larger brunt remains on the effectiveness of the ongoing counter-insurgency.


  1. Thanks for this excellent post. Your points are very clear and accurate.

    Karzai is taking a big gamble by further extending his hand to the Taliban Islamist militants. Yet from recorded Afghan history, gambles rarely have yielded positive results for the gambler and the people.


  2. Well analysis of the situation in Afghanistan. The current political and security situation once again reminds us of the late days of Dr. Najibullah's regime in Afghanistan. Same failed Jirgas, failed peace talks and peace offers and blanket Amnesty offers to the ANGRY BROTHERS. Pakistan government and ISI since 1970s generating ANGRY BROTHERS FOR AFGHANISTAN. The difference is that the ANGRY BROTHERS OF 80s are now in power and calling on other brothers who are ANGRY with them and their performances.


Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Afghan Women in Pursuit of Justice - March 2017

Afghan women in pursuit of justice7th March 2017 | by Wazhma Frogh | Originally posted on Sister-hood Magazine  Last week we were shocked by the reports of an angry mob that attacked the police station in Nuristan and shot a couple that had eloped to marry without the consent of their families and communities. The family and community that killed the couple claimed they were restoring their ‘honour’ by shooting them with rifles and scores of bullets. I was once again reminded of Farkhunda, who was lynched and murdered on the streets of Kabul. In Afghanistan, when a man takes the life of a woman and claims that he did so because she was guilty of immorality, adultery or ‘dishonoring religion and culture’, he is rarely punished for his act. In return, that man is in fact praised for having acted to ‘protect’ the religion, culture and the family’s ‘honour’. The same men, with the same mentality, brutally attacked, tortured, killed, threw her body into the river and burned it. This was me…

Lal Bibi's journey for justice

Who is Lal Bibi? to those who havent read her story in NYT and other places, I will summarize that Lal Bibi, 21, was abducted, raped & tortured for five consecutive days by the armed men who are incharge of the Afghan Local Police ( an auxilillary militia called Arbakis) in Kunduz during May 2012. She was punished for the animosity that her cousin had with the armed men of ALP. In Afghanistan, a family's 'honor' is tied with a woman of the family and she is punished to account for someone els's deeds...that is a long story.
There is nothing new about this story either. We have rape cases taking place in this part of the world almost every day but what was so strange about Lal Bibi's case was that her whole tribe stood up for her. For whatever reason ( many say its political) but seeing 50 bearded turbaned men who are the village council's head, provincial council's members, tribal leaders, the mosque mullahs and the community members coming to Kabul acc…

Our voices are not stoned to death!!!

On Friday, 06 July 2012, Ms Fawzia Koofi, one of the prominent female MPs called and with a disturbingly quiet tone asked whether I knew about the Parwan incident. I said Yes, saw a tweet from one of the BBC journalists but dont know if its true or not. She said its true and she saw the video. After we both mourned the incident, she said if women dont stand all these violence, we will all face this fate, one by one. We hanged on the phone and I started digging deeper to find out what happened. 
Though, we still dont know the exact account of the heinous act of violence and oppression that we all witnessed in that video- we are all so shocked & furious over the fact that najiba  was brutally murdered. No matter who did it, that does not make any difference. The information that we have been able to obtain to date is that Najiba, 21 year old who was either kidnapped or forced to come to the house of one of the armed commanders (apparently a taleb as the Parwan governor emphasizes) …